找回密码
 马上注册

扫一扫,访问微社区

搜索
热搜: mestrenova
楼主: 上善若水

请教这四种类似结构某个C化学位移的相对大小

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-5-28 16:27:12 | 显示全部楼层

4>3, 4>1

3>2,
1>2

3>1 (-OCO- alpha +56.5; belta +6.5; -OH alpha +49.0, belta +10.1) although 3 is close to 1

4>3>1>2

$ @+ s' z5 }/ h; l# E( `% c0 N

according to your conclusion,maybe 3 is the  lowest

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-5-28 22:02:51 | 显示全部楼层
 Why?
The conclusion is 4>3>1>2.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-5-28 23:13:32 | 显示全部楼层
  On acetylation (OH group was changed to OCOCH3 group), the alpha0 K8 \& @% N( S* M Y [ carbon will show a downfield shift while the belta carbon will show a8 a5 E- p& j7 ]0 i& i upfield shif.
+ L9 v4 j5 k$ W% A' b) K9 P# Q; ~
! h& G* o$ h# V) n9 S3 b) {See the following article how to revise a structure reported before just using the above rule!
: Y$ s& U/ ~" M
' C0 `- d0 `5 G: k* z# GOne compound with C-6 OH, C-7 OH (compound IV in the article):  chemical shift values of C-6 79.3 ppm, C-7 76.2 ppm were known.
# I% ?9 N( h; V" ` ~, @. `: `- S7 x
' }# {6 f. `% [/ } Another compound with one OH group acetylated: it could be C-6 OAc, C-7; |7 x' V3 o9 |" w$ [! B9 _ OH (compound I in the article) or could be C-6 OH, C-7OAc (compound II , B$ B3 K5 }/ Q2 l4 Qin the article). The chemical shifts of the two carbons are 78.1 and: Y a' Z6 q9 j' Q 80.5. How to determine which carbon (C-6 or C-7) has the OAC group?

/ }: i! i" J# i( ?
6 t+ s& V, G8 A- N8 f# L The auhors resovled the problem:
9 U2 y' p* |; }) A C8 \0 i* c
/ W9 g* Y; J8 E: ^, g! v2 cIf C-6 (80.5) and C-7 (78.5) were right, meaning both the chemical) e% H4 B; ?, [ shifts of C-6 (79.3 to 80.5) and C-7 (76.2 to 78.5) were increased.# x$ a; [$ _6 d$ N5 e g" M' F That assupmtion violates the above rule.
3 c2 r1 }8 i$ i1 p2 e
5 y' j$ h7 U6 c& c" M- T$ Y+ CSo chemical shift of C-6 was not 80.5 but 78.5, chemical shift of C-7 was not 78.5 but 80.5.
$ k: d; C: I" s5 B, A) c9 e
/ v3 r8 O$ I4 M' g: O- HC-6 (78.5) and C-7 (80.5) meaned that C-6 shifted to highfield (from: z1 ~6 Q, d8 I) v 79.3 to 78.5), C-7 shifted to lowfield (from 76.2 to 80.5). Logically,! n9 `3 b" t0 ~1 @ it was the C-7 with the OAC group (compound II), not the C-6 with the4 _3 C6 M: C# Q6 d7 ? t H OAC group (compound I).
, C$ H* w& n% |: Q: U
; V* [7 c/ N" {1 r8 ZSimple, logic structural revision published in 1981!

( ]$ U( W( J S! a

  + O' ~- v+ H( C7 m
: ]! i* @0 y3 v4 @7 W1 [

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?马上注册

×
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-5-28 23:17:25 | 显示全部楼层
 

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?马上注册

×
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-5-28 23:32:40 | 显示全部楼层
More example:

CH3CH2OH  chemical shift values: 18 (CH3), 58 (CH2).
CH3CH2OAc chemical shifts values: 14 (CH3), 60 (CH2).

These data should be remembered to remind the above rule.

alpha carbon 60>58;

belta carbon 14<18.

[em79][em79]
8 [, H, z6 @7 j) K$ S4 ^# S Z, n" c
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-5-28 23:48:20编辑过]
3 `0 [4 ~ ^7 j; t& t$ I
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-5-31 10:07:36 | 显示全部楼层
受益匪浅
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 马上注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|中国核磁共振论坛

GMT+8, 2025-10-15 14:20

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表